RINGS / STUDY CHRIS'S WEDDING BAND
DESIGN EXPLORATION EMERALD BANDS

INTERACTIVE DIMENSIONAL STUDY

Hidden bridge, refined.

Compare the original hidden bridge with two refined profiles: a 3.0 or 2.7 mm under-finger taper, preserved side structure and a raised, relieved stone pocket. Three real diamond candidates; actual CAD geometry — a study, not a manufacturing approval.

INTERACTIVE CAD STUDYUS 9½ · stone-matched width · platinum appearance
DESIGN STUDY — NOT FOR MANUFACTUREModel contact is not validated retention. Preload and structural safety remain unverified.
01 / OBJECT EXPLORERHIDDEN BRIDGE
Preparing the studyLoading CAD-derived geometry…
Integral shaped ends · nominal recessed seats
Loading CAD study…
View controls
Inspection
Perspective
Scale context

GPU-rendered studio: rotate, pan and zoom in real time—no refinement wait. Photographic studio lighting and bounded diamond optics are illustrative; CAD inspection remains available. The studio floor hides when it would obstruct underside or CAD inspection.

ORIGINAL COMPARISON / OFFLINE STUDIO

Original profile, in light.

Original only · fixed reference

Original hidden bridge · 4.37 ct reference LG742548068 · 7.99 mm band width · 3.50 mm under-finger thickness. These historical saved renders show the original geometry only, not either refined profile, and never change with the controls above. Polished platinum is an assumed finish; the stone retains the CAD's approximate facets.

Original hidden-bridge profile only, ray-traced three-quarter studio view
01 / Three-quarter · body and setting
Original hidden-bridge profile only, ray-traced top view of the east-west emerald
02 / Top · stone and band proportions
Original hidden-bridge profile only, ray-traced bridge and stone underside
03 / Underside · pocket and bridge

Physically based RGB rendering, not a prediction of this diamond's brilliance or fire. No spectral dispersion, actual stone scan or measured platinum optical response. Original ring and stone geometry unchanged; no refined-profile rendering or structural analysis is implied. Original render provenance.

ABOUT THE GEOMETRY

Geometry before appearance.

Every profile uses locally shaped ends and a band width matching the selected stone width. Compare the original geometry with refined under-finger tapers, longer shoulder transitions and softened edges. The refined pocket raises the stone to allow more backing and clearance.

Measured envelope, approximate facets

The three real diamond candidates use certificate envelopes and reported crown/pavilion percentages. Unmeasured facets, corner cuts and girdles remain approximate. Platinum, brushed-metal and diamond appearance are illustrative; this viewer does not validate optics or replace inspection of a real stone.

Nominal seats, not engineered retention

Nominal seats are cut to approximate stones, not purchase-specific scans. The hidden bridge has a narrower curved waist with smooth flares into the band and a comfort-fit underside. Its relieved pocket clears the keel and lower pavilion rather than bearing against them. Optical appearance, cleaning access and strength need real-stone and setting review. No profile has validated retention, contact pressure, preload or manufacturing safety. No structural analysis of the refined profiles is presented here.

Bridge and pocket-floor dimensions are study assumptions, not structural minima. “Hidden” means tucked underneath, not guaranteed invisible through real diamonds. Inspect the underside and optional sections.

A generic sense of scale

The finger and full hand are procedural context at millimetre scale, not a personal scan. They cannot establish personal fit, comfort or wearable clearance.

Model assumptions & coordinate frame